Abstract
|
This study aims to examine the use of
Collocation in English Essay Writing at Undergraduate Level. Collocations in
language acquisition is important moreover, learning a second language is not just a matter
of learning, its grammar and vocabulary
only but also the proper
use of it. The researcher focused in on examining the utilization
of lexical collocation, blunders and syntactic collocation mistakes by the students of B.S.
English at KFUEIT. Cluster random sampling technique was used. 250 students
were selected out of 700 students of BS 1st semester, Fourth semester and 7th
semester. Selected sample wrote an easy on the topic “My Experience as a
Student at KFUEIT”. After the collection of data, it was analyzed by using
"Antcoc" software. The results showed that the frequency of lexical collocation errors were greater
than the frequency of grammatical collocation
errors. In these results, the researcher found that Lexical 1 (Verb + Noun)
and Lexical 2 (Adjective + Noun) collocation errors were mostly found. |
|
|
KEYWORDS |
Collocation, ESL, Grammatical Collocation, Lexical Collocation |
Introduction
Collocations are combinations of formulaic sequences of words (Granger,
2018; Hernandez et al., 2018) . Collocations occasionally include
non-compositional and ambiguous idioms, and in some cases, they are
compositional and transparent combinations of words
(Aguinaga Echeverria, 2018). Collocations are both stored
and retrieved from the memory as single words
and there is also no need for language users try to formulate these combinations
based on syntactic rules (Kim &
Oh, 2020).
Collocations play a vital role in the
acquisition as well as rapid and fluent production of language. They help the
producers to better express ideas and convey meanings. In fact, using formulaic language is not a matter of grammatical restrictions but it is a matter of convention.
Normally, life-long exposure to conventions of a language makes their
acquisition easy and conscious. That is why first language learners have no difficulty in acquiring these important
aspects of language. But these conventionalized strings of words should be taught to foreign language
learners due to their limited exposure to the target language (Shehata,
2008).
Moreover, the language-specific nature of collocations may require
learners to create combinations which are common in their first language
but unconventional or
impossible in the second language. Therefore,
students who are writing in a language other than their native language may
have little awareness about the use of these collocations in comparison to expert writers
(Groom, 2009) .
The native language speakers drive the bases of the collocations. In
order to master the linguistic requirements, there is a dire need to select or
target a language for the purpose of learning. However, the chosen language may
affect the efficient usage of native language. (Fan, 2009). The people who want
to learn the collocations want to learn the English language
should learn the proper usage of the words.
Collocations seem to be important in
learning a language because words are learned
and used in context, and without knowing
the proper context
in which a word can be used, one cannot make a claim
that he or she has mastered that word. “Collocation represents true or false
meaning of a sentence” (Molinaro&Carreiras, 2010). In this scenario
the purpose of the study is to an analysis
of the use of collocation in English Essay Writing at
BS Level”.
Literature Review
Shitu (2015) conducted
research study on Collocation Errors in English as Second Language (ESL) Essay
Writing. Both native speakers and people learning a second language make
mistakes when trying to become proficient in the target language. Collocation
deals with the relationship of meaning between lexical items. When a word
appears in a sentence, the related or naturally co-occurring word will
automatically come to mind because there is a sort of "natural order"
in which words are arranged or relate to one another in sentences. Therefore, it is an error when students improperly pair or arrange such lexical items that 'naturally' occur
together in a text. The majority of the research group's participants who are
learning a second language make collocation mistakes, it has been observed. Such a study is very important because
it sheds light on the types of mistakes that students commonly make. As
a result, the language instructor will be better able to pinpoint the root
causes of these errors and correct them, assisting the students in acquiring some level of language proficiency.
The study's goal is to comprehend the nature of these mistakes
as roadblocks to producing
quality essays. The goal of the study is to identify the errors, examine their
structural makeup to see if there are any commonalities among
students in this area, and look for any patterns that might help the researcher comprehend the causes and origins of these errors.
As part of a descriptive study, the researcher samples about 900 essays from
300 undergraduate English language learners
at the Federal College of Education in Kano, North-West Nigeria, or three
essays per student. The essays, which were presented during three
different lecture periods,
shared a common
theme (i.e., the same subjects), and they ranged in length (i.e.
same number of words). At three different lecture events, the essays
were written during the lecture
hour.. The errors
were found in a systematic way, and even if they appeared
multiple times in students' essays, they were only recorded once. The identified numbers of occurrences were converted into percentages
in order to compile the data using percentages. According to the study's
findings, there are patterns
in the similarities and regular and repeated errors.
The pattern found led researchers to the conclusion that
students' collocation errors were caused by inadequate teaching and learning,
which led to incorrect rule generalization.
Nesselhauf (2003) The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners
of English and Some
Implications for Teaching. The current study examines the use of three different proficiency levels of Hebrew native speakers'
written English verb-noun
collocations.
We assembled a learner corpus—roughly 300,000
words—of argumentative and descriptive essays for this purpose.
We chose LOCNESS,
a corpus of young adult native
English speakers, for comparison. In order to extract verb-noun collocations,
we retrieved the 220 nouns that
appeared the most frequently in both the learner corpus and the LOCNESS corpus.
After that, we conducted two different kinds of comparisons: learners were compared with native speakers
on the frequency of collocation use, and learners
were compared with other learners of various second-language proficiency levels
on the frequency and correctness of collocations. The results showed that
learners produced significantly fewer collocations than native speakers’
at all three proficiency
levels, that the number of collocations only increased at the advanced level,
and that errors—particularly interlingua ones—persisted even at advanced
levels of proficiency. In light of
the characteristics of collocations and communicative learning, we discuss the findings and make some pedagogical recommendations.
Multiword units are crucial, and there are learning issues
related to them that have been recognized for a very long
time and have been discussed ever since (Brown, 1974; Granger, 1998; Lewis,
2000; Marton, 1977; Palmer, 1933; Pawley &Syder, 1983; Richards, 1976;
Schmitt, 2004; Sinclair, 1991; Wray, 2002).In light of the characteristics of
collocations and communicative learning, we discuss the findings and make some
pedagogical recommendations. Multiword units are crucial,
and there are learning issues related to them
that have been recognized for a very long time and have been discussed ever since (Brown, 1974; Granger, 1998; Lewis, 2000; Marton, 1977; Palmer, 1933; Pawley &Syder,
1983; Richards, 1976;
Schmitt, 2004; Sinclair, 1991; Wray, 2002).Multiword units, also known as prefabricated patterns, preassembled units, chunks,
ready-made utterances, and so on (Foster,
2001; Howarth, 1998;
Nattinger&DeCarrico, 1992; Wray,
1999), are now considered to
be an essential part of second-language (L2) lexical competence in addition to
the knowledge of single words. The reason for this is that understanding
multiword units enhances
the clarity and fluency of both spoken
and written language. Mastery of the idiomatic
dimension of language makes the learner come across as proficient and fluent (Boers, Eyckmans, Kappel, Stengers, &Demecheleer, 2006) and distinguishes advanced learners from intermediate ones (Thornbury, 2002). According
to Gledhill
(2000, p. 1), "it is impossible
for a writer to be fluent without a thorough knowledge of the phraseology of the particular field he or she is writing in."This is due, in part, to
the fact that a significant portion of the procedural vocabulary used in
academic disciplines is composed of predicate structures like "make a
claim,""reach a conclusion,""adopt a strategy," and
"set forth criteria" (Howarth, 1998). On the other hand, a lack of
this knowledge might make it more challenging to understand what students are saying. According to Hill (1999,
p. 5), students with good ideas frequently lose points because they are
not aware of the four or five most important collocations for a key word that
is essential to the topic of their essay. As a result, they produce longer,
occasionally grammatically incorrect, and ineffective utterances that fail to
convey what they are trying to say.
Material and Methods Population
A comprehensive set of fundamentals can be students or things in general
that own some standard features illustrated by the criterion set out the by the
scholars. The population for this research study was all students of BS-English studying
at KFUEIT.
Sample
A sample of the research
is understood as a set of data that can be collected
from both primary and secondary sources and empirically using
preconceived selection method-random techniques adopted for the data
collection. About 250 students were selected randomly out of 500
students as a sample from selected semesters of BS- English (1st ,4th ,7th).
Instruments
Based on the literature review and
required information, the researcher developed an essay-type test after
necessary amendment in the light of the expert opinion; the test was finalized.
The collocation system and patterns by Benson and Ilson were
applied to analyze the data
to surface the collocation
mistakes. This method was first employed by the British
National Corpus (BNC)
to find out the subjects
regarding collocation mistakes. Then this analysis
was categorized into two domains;
lexical and grammatical
according to Benson and Ilson
method. (1986).
The examples mentioned blow are extracted from the British National
Corpus to further understand the reason of collocation errors.
Collocation mistakes were found in the compositions. We do not have to wear a big hat, in this sentence the adjective big makes collocation of the noun hat in
an quite rough way.
1. The BNC method was also
employed to find the phrase but a ‘big hat ‘ was nowhere to be found.
2. Albeit, many examples can be found with the word hat in the corpus for instance,
3. The mobile call ended. Jack put on his hat and stood in the dark, peeping through the window at the empty streets ahead of him
4. For John, a big hat for short
Brian would be too ugly. He is sick of competing with his peers and their fancy hats. Hence, the right adjective to
collocate with the hat was found a heavy instead of big.
Results and Discussion Data Analysis
Researcher collected data about use of
collocation in English essay writing at undergraduate level. This particular
research study focused on identifying the use of lexical and grammatical
collocations and frequency of mistakes made by the undergraduate students while
using the collocations in their essay writings.
The researcher analyzed the essays of random
classes(1st,4th
,7th ) from BS first semester to the
students of BS English 7th Semester. Researcher analyzed
total 250 essays from all random classes of BS English which were selected as
sample to conduct this research study. Researcher analyzed 36 essays
from each class and analyzed
the usage of collocations in
their writings and the frequency of right and wrong use of collocations.
Table 1
BS-English 1st
|
Error Type |
Error Pattern |
Number of collocation errors |
|
Lexical1 |
Verb +Noun |
22 |
|
Lexical2 |
ADJective+ Noun |
15 |
|
Lexical3 |
Noun+Verb |
18 |
|
Lexical4 |
Noun of Noun |
3 |
|
Lexical5 |
Adverb + Adjective |
8 |
|
Lexical6 |
Verb +Adverb |
11 |
|
Lexical7 |
Conjunction |
13 |
|
Grammatical1 |
Noun +preposition |
18 |
|
Grammatical2 |
Noun to infinitive |
6 |
|
Grammatical3 |
N + that clause |
7 |
|
Grammatical4 |
Preposition +
Noun |
13 |
|
Grammatical5 |
Adjective +Preposition |
5 |
|
Grammatical6 |
Adjective + to infinitive |
8 |
|
Grammatical7 |
Adjective clause |
0 |
|
Grammatical8 |
Subject + Verb –ing
form |
11 |
|
Total frequency of wrong
collocation |
2459 |
|
|
Total frequency of right
collocation |
2617 |
|
|
Total words in comprehension |
513 |
|
|
Total Type of words used |
15041 |
|
|
Total Collocates words
in comprehension |
1632 |
|
Table 2
BS-English 4th
|
Error Type |
Error Pattern |
Number of
errors |
|
Lexical1 |
Verb +Noun |
14 |
|
Lexical2 |
ADJective+
Noun |
12 |
|
Lexical3 |
Noun+Verb |
22 |
|
Lexical4 |
Noun of Noun |
7 |
|
Lexical5 |
Adverb + Adjective |
10 |
|
Lexical6 |
Verb +Adverb |
13 |
|
Lexical7 |
Conjunction |
18 |
|
Grammatical1 |
Noun +preposition |
16 |
|
Grammatical2 |
Noun to infinitive |
10 |
|
Grammatical3 |
N + that clause |
15 |
|
Grammatical4 |
Preposition + Noun |
08 |
|
Grammatical5 |
Adjective +Preposition |
09 |
|
Grammatical6 |
Adjective + to infinitive |
11 |
|
Grammatical7 |
Adjective clause |
17 |
|
Grammatical8 |
Subject + Verb
–ing form |
10 |
|
Total frequency of wrong
collocation |
5161 |
|
|
Total frequency of right
collocation |
5353 |
|
|
Total words in comprehension |
787 |
|
|
Total Type of words used |
810 |
|
|
Total Collocates words in comprehension |
209 |
|
Table 3
BS-English 7th
|
Error Type |
Error Pattern |
Number of errors |
|
Lexical1 |
Verb +Noun |
06 |
|
Lexical2 |
ADJective+
Noun |
04 |
|
Lexical3 |
Noun+Verb |
07 |
|
Lexical4 |
Noun of Noun |
05 |
|
Lexical5 |
Adverb + Adjective |
07 |
|
Lexical6 |
Verb +Adverb |
10 |
|
Lexical7 |
Conjunction |
04 |
|
Grammatical1 |
Noun +preposition |
08 |
|
Grammatical2 |
Noun to infinitive |
09 |
|
Grammatical3 |
N
+ that clause |
03 |
|
Grammatical4 |
Preposition +
Noun |
09 |
|
Grammatical5 |
Adjective +Preposition |
11 |
|
Grammatical6 |
Adjective + to infinitive |
14 |
|
Grammatical7 |
Adjective clause |
04 |
|
Grammatical8 |
Subject + Verb –ing
form |
06 |
|
Total frequency of worng collocation |
107 |
|
|
Total frequency of right collocation |
6323 |
|
|
Total words in comprehension |
6430 |
|
|
Total Type of words used |
1692 |
|
|
Total Collocates words in comprehension |
1161 |
|
|
Total Type of collocates words
used |
433 |
|
Table 4
Frequency of the Use of Collocations by BS English
Students
|
Class Name |
Total No of Essays
Analyzed |
Total No of
Collocation used in the Essays |
Total No of words
Analyzed |
Frequency of Use of Collocations |
|
BS English 1st Semester |
36 |
1632 |
15041 |
9.21 % |
|
BS English 4th Semester |
36 |
2200 |
25000 |
14.5% |
|
BS English 7th Semester |
36 |
2600 |
26000 |
15.5% |
Table 4 showed the usage of collocations in English essay writing by the
students of BS English from one to seven semesters. Results of the content
analysis presented that BS English 1st semester have used total type of
1632 collocation with total collocate words
of 15041, 9.21% frequency out of total words.BS English 4th
semester have used total type of 2200 collocation with total
collocate words of 25000, 14.5% frequency out of all words. BS English
7th semester have used total
type of 2260 collocation with total 2600 collocate words, 15.5% frequency out of all words. This frequency showed
that the use of collocations increased with the
seniority level of semesters as shown in the above mentioned table.
Table 5
What types of mistakes
students make in using collocation in narrative essay writing at Undergraduate level
|
Error Type |
Error Pattern |
Total Errors |
|
|
|
|
|
Lexical1 |
Verb +Noun |
30 |
|
Lexical2 |
Adjective+ Noun |
22 |
|
Lexical3 |
Noun+Verb |
35 |
|
Lexical4 |
Noun of Noun |
20 |
|
Lexical5 |
Adverb + Adjective |
33 |
|
Lexical6 |
Verb +Adverb |
53 |
|
Lexical7 |
Conjunction |
58 |
|
Grammatical1 |
Noun preposition |
33 |
|
Grammatical2 |
Noun+ infinitive |
23 |
|
Grammatical3 |
Noun Plus
Clause |
30 |
|
Grammatical4 |
Preposition + Noun |
28 |
|
Grammatical5 |
Adjective /Preposition |
22 |
|
Grammatical6 |
Adjective + to infinitive |
25 |
|
Grammatical7 |
Adjective + that
clause |
20 |
|
Grammatical8 |
Subject+ Verb-ing form |
25 |
Conclusion
The
present research has its main focus on identifying and labeling the mistakes
and grammatical errors that students generally make while using collocation in
narrative essay writing. In English language collocation is used on large scale
to complete the sentence
and to add the value of one’s speech. To achieve the first and the
foremost objective of the current
study, the researcher asked the students
of KFUIET to submit an essay on the topic
“University Experience as a Student at KFUEIT”. The researcher selected
the students from BS English semester one to seven as his population and drew a sample of 255 students. The sample was asked to write an essay so that the researcher can identify the
lexical and grammatical collocations. Below mentioned types of collocation mistakes are examined by
the researcher from the submitted essays by the participants.
Table 6
|
Error Type |
Error Pattern |
|
Lexical1 |
Verb +Noun |
|
Lexical2 |
Adjective+ Noun |
|
Lexical3 |
Nound+Verb |
|
Lexical4 |
Noun of Noun |
|
Lexical5 |
Adverb + Adjective |
|
Lexical6 |
Verb +Adverb |
|
Lexical7 |
Conjunction |
|
Grammatical1 |
Noun preposition |
|
Grammatical2 |
Noun+ infinitive |
|
Grammatical3 |
Noun Plus Clause |
|
Grammatical4 |
Preposition Noun |
|
Grammatical5 |
Adjective /Preposition |
|
Grammatical6 |
Adjective + to infinitive |
|
Grammatical7 |
Adjective +
that clause |
|
Grammatical8 |
Subject+ Verb-ing form |
By analyzing the essays thoroughly, collected from the selected sample,
the researcher identified total
457 overall collocation mistakes out of 14400 words which
were being scrutinized. Among these identified 457 mistakes by the researcher, 251 errors were lexical in nature and 192 mistakes were
grammatical.
The second major purpose of this research work was to label the frequency
of wrong use of collocation in English essay writing at BS level in the
university students. The findings of
this logical piece of work revealed that collocation mistakes were found by
BS-English. First semester students made
(158) mistakes out of 2617 mistakes, BS- English Fourth semester students made (192) mistakes out of 5353 mistakes, and
BS- English Seventh semester students made (107) mistakes out of 6430 mistakes.
Total mistakes of collocations by all BS–English classes both lexical and
grammatical were 457 out of 14400 collocations .
The Third main purpose of this research was to explore the right use of collocation in English essay writing at BS-Level. The findings of this research study showed that the researcher found total right collocations used by BS-English First semester students used 2459 right collocations out of 2617, BS-English Fourth semester students used right collocations (5161) out of 5353, and BS-English Seventh semester students also used right collocations (6323) out of 6430 collocations. Total right collocations used by all BS –English classes were 13937 collocations out of 14400 collocations. These were both lexical and grammatical collocations.




0 Comments